![]() If the aircraft is managed by a CAMO or CAO, such organisation should ‘approve’ the AMP. Except for the mandatory requirements (see also remark below) the owner may decide, under his/her full responsibility, to deviate from the applicable scheduled maintenance recommendations (including ICA if the AMP is not based on the MIP) without the need to justify such deviation(s) (see GM1 ML.A.302). Such declared AMP does not need to be sent to the competent authority. The owner, when she/he has not contracted the continuing airworthiness management to a CAMO or CAO, should ‘declare’ the AMP assuming responsibility for its content. Certification of products and organisationsįor aircraft complying with Part-ML (refer to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014, the AMP should be based either on the applicable ICA or on the Minimum Inspection Programme (MIP) defined in ML.A.302(d).Certification Support for Validation (CSV).Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to an Airworthiness Directive (AD).Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Alternative Means of Compliance (AltMoC).Drones with class identification label C0-C6. ![]() Provisions applicable to both ‘open’ and ’specific’ category.Airspace Usage requirements – DLS/CPDLC.Airspace Usage Requirement (ACAS II v7.1).Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTD).Performance-based Navigation applicability.Operational Suitability Data (OSD) for flight crew (FC).Special Categories of Passengers (SCPs).Additional Airworthiness specifications.Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA).Training and licensing of maintenance personnel.Aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness.Design certificates and design organisation approvals.Development of Safety Promotion Content.Aviation training on innovative domains.Strategy & Safety Management Directorate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |